My take on what's missing from the magazines or why Stampington will probably never have me in their magazines again
I thought I'd elaborate on my previous comment about why I am disenchanted with the $15 magazines that are out there. You know, the ones that I keep buying in the hope that they morph into something different. It's not the quality (and it definitely ain't the quantity) of the magazines that is lacking. The photos are gorgeous. The artists are talented. The magazines are packed full of stuff. What's missing for me, is the substance. Wait. Don't get mad at me. Hang in there for a minute and let me finish. The magazines are too formulaic. Take, for example, Artful Blogging, each article is written by a different blogger. When you go to that blogger's blog, their voice sings loud and clear, right? Their style shines and jumps out from your reader at you. Well, why, when you read it in the magazine does every single blogger sound the same? I could look at the pictures for hours that accompany the text, but it's the text that is severely lacking. Let's look at Art Journaling. I have mixed emotions on how each issue only spotlights a small handful of artists. Yes, it's good to focus on a small group and let their voices and styles shine through. On the other hand, it's an issue of static. The artists are all discussing technique, because that is what the magazine focuses on. Personally, technique doesn't matter to me when I want to learn from another artist. What matters most to me, is the why. Why do you want to work in a journal vs on canvas? What are you trying to say and why? What's going through your head as you approach a page? It's not a problem of a lack of fabulously interesting artists being published (though I do tend to roll my eyes when they focus on the same artists over and over as if no one else is creating journal pages), there are tons of people, worldwide pouring their hearts and souls into their books. It's not about making pretty pages to them. It's about something more and that's what's seriously lacking. Last, but not least is Where Women Create. My question to you is, does your studio look like any of the ones in the magazine? Can we all yell a collective and proud, "Hell, no!" Why? Because we're artists and when we call ourselves working artists, our studios should reflect that expression. They should look loved, cherished, lived in and most importantly, worked in. Show us some messy studios, please! I haven't given up hope yet. I keep faithfully buying the magazines usually because there's a small handful of artists in there whose work I love and new artists to discover. Yet, this faith won't last forever. Something has to change and it should change soon. |
Comments
I want to gag every time I look at "Where Women Create". It's as if the world didn't have enough "let's be perfect" in Martha Stewart that now it has carried over to photographing STAGED art studios! While everything looks gorgeous, it's completely unrealistic. Even if my studio ever looked like those in the magazines, which it never will, I couldn't even work in something so perfect and neat. I'd be completely, creatively frozen. Muse checked out. I try to look for inexpensive, creative ways of organizing but, I can't even wrap my brain around "all pretty" because my studio is purely for function... and it's a MESS!
I sure do agree with you about the WWC mag. Could not believe the studios in the one issue I bought - made me feel like such a hick. I prefer to look at STUDIOS magazines.
But I've only seen one Artful Blogging and a handful of the Stampington mags. I really like those Stampington mags because at this stage in my art career I'm enjoying the eye candy...
meanwhile, I'd love for you to visit my blog when you have a moment or 2.
Peace,
LuLu
www.lulu-too-beaucoup.blogspot.com
The repetition of names and styles in the more technique-oriented magazines has started to wear on me, as has the repetition of content from one magazine to another and the countless pages devoted to the publisher's other magazines. Once I started counting and comparing the pages of content vs the publisher's own advertising, I realized I was unlikely to renew for another year.
On the positive side, I have felt that Rice's interviews with artists have introduced people into the pages of the magazine whose work would otherwise not be seen there and whose work often doesn't fit the mold of the rest of the magazine's style.
I love those magazines, but a lot of it has to do with the feel of them. Not that the better quality paper will persuade me to buy them instead of more supplies.
I do enjoy Cloth, Ppaer, Scissors though. Enough variety of materials and how they can all be used together. Very nice!
- Jazz
LOL, Emie
Hugs Patti
PS Angie...well said......
I agree with you. I want to read about how the artist processes the material, etc. What did she discover about herself from the pages she created? To me, art journaling is not just about "pretty pages," as you say. Yes, the substance is lacking in some of these magazines. I wish they would feature artists like you, Juliana Coles, Traci Bunkers and some others that have dedicated themeselves to this work and their students. It goes beyond technique.
I am complete agreement with you on every one of your comments. I am glad you are not afraid to voice your opinion.
Keep up your amazing blog and artwork! You are a true inspiration!
Amy
I am complete agreement with you on every one of your comments. I am glad you are not afraid to voice your opinion.
Keep up your amazing blog and artwork! You are a true inspiration!
Amy
Peace & Love,
~Barb~
And totally forget "WWC"!!!! Waaaaay to staged and "too perfect".
Wouldn't it be lovely if the editors read this post to see what artists are really craving!!! Bravo! Hugs, Terri xoxo
http://www.couragetocreatewriteandlove.com/p/where-i-create.html
Rice at one point gave away one of the $15 magazines, saying she couldn't bear to cut it up for collage after paying so much for it... I'm getting over that. :) my collection is heading for the scissors.
I used to LOVE Somerset Studio - back when it was mostly calligraphy with some paper arts and painting thrown in. Now that it's morphed into another "messy mixed media" magazine, I'm not even tempted any more... and the apparent idea that only women can make art or create these days... Oh dear. I feel a rant coming on!
Erin
What an interesting post and I enjoyed reading the comments left. You obviously hit a nerve. I, too, purchase the ones you mention. I absolutely see what you are saying, however, I find myself still taken by their pages. For certain, not all of them speak to me, but usually a few from each issue do. Maybe it is partially because I so want to art journal, but have yet to take the step. I blog and take photos and write just about every day and adore doing so. I think your thoughts should be shared with S&C as they have to keep evolving to stay alive. You have some good ones. Hugs, Margie
I wouldn't pay $15 on a magazine unless it was a really really good one.
I love seeing those pristine, freshly painted and super organized studios. I don't know why. I have this love for cleanliness even though I'm a messy person myself.
My "studio" corner right now is looking pretty shabby... my wood desktop is covered with paint splotches, glue and xacto blade cuts! Time for a sanding! lol
i wrote a diary as a kid and teenager and am not into rambling anymore. i am not interested in the whys because that is personal and private to me. everybody is different, i just want to play and have fun. play with paint, play with pens, play with my glue stick and scissors, play with my rubberstamps. and yes, personal things always flow into my pages. but that's more private. i prefer privacy.
never bought or even looked at wwc, not interested. i could care less. stampington also must compromise with what they publish, if they go bancrupt, we won't have anything! oh no!! and i think they try to improve and move on. i'm sure if they stopped some mags, nobody would notice though.
i rotate between several stampington publications from month to month, support a german vendor, and am enjoying them. still. after all these years. :)
so much for not rambling haha
Jami
jamiosh.blogspot.com (Artelicious)
Everytime I see one of those studios I think those artists are not creating, they just simply like to have a "studio" Lol!
To me art journaling isn't pretty. It's gritty, about emotion, the hard stuff in life, it's not about sticking the latest Tim Holtz product on your page. It's part writing part paint, part sticking sh!t to the page. Its raw, emotional and not always pretty. It is the antithesis of Art Journaling Magazine.
A bunch of my friends and I started a zine called Art Journaling: It's All Good We try to show some of the less slick stuff. We're working the kinks out, our website sucks but we're pressing on. When we do our "business" conference calls we specifically talk about making NOT slick, not like art journaling magazine.
Thanx for writing on this,I gave up a long time ago on the creative mass produced mags as they were tiresome and in my opinion the glam became tedious and same old.
My $15.00 can go towards supplies or taking myself out on an art date..
like anything magazines such as that have been written about here have a place,however in this artists life..I say no!!!!
more and more i unplug from the overdone and untouchables..
Art On!!
In Artistic Solidarity;
Rhonda
So I was especially disappointed with the latest issue of Art Journaling - it was so samey as the previous couple.
I think you've put your finger on the problem - I want to know WHY as much as how someone journals.
http://drop-cloth.blogspot.com/2011/01/messy-room.html?showComment=1296467772713#c5889271769112167094
I also like a magazine to have "new" content. When I flip through the ones you have mentioned I have "already" seen those photos, and those re-printed blog posts in most cases. Like you I want a 'glimpse' into something new.
I do not mind paying more for a magazine that has fresh content or offers me an 'inside view' of an artist, author or artisan.
I LOVE Uppercase magazine--frsh, new content. Very few ads and inside views. It does have a higher price tag, but I don't mind since it manages to surprise and excite me with each subsequent issue.
I think we need to support the magazine industry, however I am not a fan of regurgitation.
The internet has so much information and I want a magazine to be something fresh and exciting when I read through it.
And here's the funniest thing of all . . . back in April 2007 I sent in my birdhouse and bird necklaces AND a little project with shrinkplastic. They asked me for both. I waited for MONTHS for them to come back and I was hearing from friends that they had lost a few of their submissions and I was very nervous about it. Finally, after the magazine with the birdhouses was published they sent them back to me after holding them 6 months. The other project however had been lost.
You can imagine how surprised I was to get it back last week with the original letter I wrote dated 4/17/07 and a form letter with it as though I had submitted it in the last year. If only they had taken a moment to notice the date on my letter and that, since then, I had not submitted anything. Really I was so relieved that it wasn't the jewelry that was lost!
I also knew the moment the magazine "WWC" came out that my studio would never grace it's pages. My studio isn't neat, bare and tidy. My studio overwhelms me but in a good way. I could get lost in there and never come out and isn't that really what a studio is for?
Couldn't agree more with all your comments, Kelly. Thanks for speaking for all of us.
I don't even bother to get Where Women Create anymore--or as I refer to it--the Stepford Studio magazine.
It just doesn't interest me!
and please, who's art studio's REALLY look like that? Except for a minority that keep it Martha Stewart perfect most people's rooms look like a cyclone have blown through it. I am not in the small minority, I tend to focus on creating not buying the perfect storage container. I put down those magazines feeling inadequate and depressed.